OC METRO CALENDAR

  • September 2010
    SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    2930311234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293012
    3456789
Add an event

Cassie Hoag, past president, NAWBO OC  

Click here to read full bio.

Friday, April 10, 2009
Is the media fueling the recession?
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Sweet, elusive summertime
Of news feeds and good news
Thank God for Internet news feeds and alerts. If we do a good job at setting up our filters, we can keep track of the news and events most meaningful to our lives – without having to weed through the massive amount of information now literally at our fingertips. Because it’s important to my business and to my role as president of NAWBO (National Association of Women Business Owners) here in O.C., I try to keep my “news feed finger” on the pulse of small business legislation.

So, yesterday one of those “better take a look” stories landed on my desktop. Amid a political smorgasbord of high-profile and volatile issues, Washington somehow made time to address two potentially game-changing Senate bills for startups and small businesses. Essentially, Sens. Landrieu and Snowe, leading the bipartisan Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, are working to revive and update two sweeping SBA initiatives: one having to do with availability of counseling and resources, and the other with economic incentives to stimulate innovation and technology transfer.

May sound boring, but it’s not. Consider this: As part of the Entrepreneurial Development Act of 2009, the SBA’s counseling programs will be reauthorized to provide small businesses with the tools they need to succeed, teaching them how to write and execute business plans, manage cash flow or put together successful loan packages. The committee points out that for every dollar invested in counseling, $2.86 is returned to the Treasury in the form of increased tax dollars. And SBA counseling programs are estimated to create or save more than 200,000 jobs a year. Now, this seems worthwhile. And tangible. This reauthorization will specifically jumpstart the Small Business Development Center program (SBDC), SCORE, the Women's Business Center program (WBC) and its grant process, the National Women's Business Council and other programs. It also establishes an online networking, information and education resource platform for small businesses. Wow! Music to my NAWBO (and client) “ears.”
 
Also shaking the cobwebs off of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (SBTT) programs, this portion of the act more than triples the funding available for SBIR grants and increases that for SBTT. It also reopens the door to venture-backed startups – which often incubate the disruptive technologies and business models that ultimately stimulate industries and employ thousands – and have been effectively shut out from these programs since 2001. This is very meaningful to us here in Orange County, where many of our promising medical device and other life-science companies have been thwarted by limited access to capital.

Of course, the Senate will continue to vet these bills before bringing them to vote, and the House will do the same on its version, which I understand is quite similar. We’ll see what comes out of the legislative process. I’m hopeful that the final bills will indeed put ARRA (the Obama administration’s economic stimulus initiative) to work for promising small businesses. Whatever the outcome, I’ll know almost instantaneously with the click of a mouse.

And as a hands-full citizen, juggling career, family and volunteer work, I’m supremely grateful for the likes of the WSJ Small Business Journal, Google Alerts and even the federal government’s surprisingly accessible and increasingly user-friendly Internet portals. They all make me smarter and better informed. They all serve my business, my clients and my community.


Reader Comments
"more than triples the funding available for SBIR grants" – where did you see that in the Senate bill s.1233? I see a proposed increase from 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent over 10 years with the increase dedicated to later-stage commercialization (such as weapons testing) that may not go to the small company at all. I don't see any increase in the total small business set aside in the House bill either.
Tom Butler
Companies with  less than 50 percent VC investment can already participate fully in SBIR. The new VC industry lobbying effort wants to let in companies that are VC-majority owned and controlled and not true small businesses. Such VC-controlled companies are focused on issues like VC-owner near-term exit strategies, not the long perspective and innovation focus of true small businesses. Even at the end of the day, the VC production jobs are likely to be relocated to wherever in the world offers the lower cost; individual-controlled small businesses tend to locate in their hometowns. Don't be fooled – this is a big-business raid on a very successful government program. With only 2.5 percent of the Federal government R&D, SBIR companies generate as many patents as all universities (who get 35 percent) and five times as many patents per $ as large businesses (who get 55 percent). And the small business rules weren't changed back in 2001/2003, they were just enforced when a business with AIG (yes, that one) and a Canadian VC as its biggest shareholders tried to get an award. Small businesses create 80 percent of our net new jobs, and have created more than 100 percent of the net new jobs in the last two recessions. If we let in the VC-controlled companies, we will be subsidizing VC investors while cutting R&D funding to the small businesses that are creating the real innovations that are building American jobs. Even so, the House appears to be poised to do just this. Whereas the Senate bill restricts the VCs and boost the 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent over 14 years, with many other good changes, the VERY DIFFERENT House bill lets in the VCs fully, changes the program to fit the VC agenda, provides a rural preference (to win the farm vote; and Orange County won't qualify, and doesn't increase the 2.5 percent at all).
Kevin Burns
Leave a Comment
* Name:
* Email:
URL:
* Comment:
Allowed Tags : <A>, <B>, <I>, <BLOCKQUOTE>