|
||||
![]() Courtesy of Anaheim/O.C. Visitor & Convention Bureau Tourism officials last week issued an open letter to the Comic-Con Board of Directors, announcing the launch of a facebook page and listing the reasons why the region would be a prime spot for the annual event. Comic-Con draws some 125,000 attendees and is the largest of its kind in the U.S. A bid was also submitted earlier this year. "This is a pop-culture type of convention, so we decided to take a pop-culture type of an angle to communicate to their (Comic-Con's) board," says Anaheim/Orange County Visitor & Convention Bureau spokeswoman Elaine Cali. The comic-book gathering has been held in San Diego for the past 40 years. But Comic-Con officials are currently considering alternative locations throughout Southern California, including the local venue, which boasts a total facility area of 1.6 million square feet and is the largest convention center on the West Coast. Cali says local officials hope to stir a grass-roots effort to bring Comic-Con to the venue – and so far, it's garnering notice. The facebook fan page, which launched last Wednesday, already has more than 1,000 fans – a testament to the "fervor of the Southern California crowd ... at the mere consideration of Comic-Con International moving to Anaheim," which was noted in the letter. What's more, Cali believes Comic-Con officials are weighing the benefits of the venue – they are expected to discuss the matter during their April board meeting. "You need to be assured that moving to Anaheim is the best decision you could ever make," stated the letter. "The outcome of this endeavor is unknown, but the effort will benefit us all by helping you decide the best possible location for Comic-Con International 2013 and beyond." The full correspondence is available here. Related headlines BlizzCon storms into Anaheim in October State spends nearly $40,000 to sell O.C. fairgrounds OC METRO, March issue: 'Adventure in San Diego' |
||||
| Comment at 3/29/2010 |
| Comment at 3/29/2010 |
| Comment at 3/29/2010 |
| Comment at 3/29/2010 |